Please read my contribution to an article published in Fiduciary News...
Social Security Reform Requires A Dual-Track Approach for Retirees and Future Workers
by Christopher Carosa, February 11, 2025
Social Security remains one of the nation’s most contentious and critical social insurance programs. As lawmakers deliberate over its future, the challenge is twofold: safeguard the full benefits that nearly one‑third of retirees depend on while reforming the system for a younger generation facing different economic realities.
Recent government data sheds light on the urgency of reform. According to the Social Security Administration’s Trustees Report, the program’s trust fund faces significant long‑term challenges if current policies remain unchanged. Projections indicate that without intervention, benefit payouts could be jeopardized in the coming decades. In addition, a Congressional Research Service report explains that if current FICA tax receipts prove insufficient, benefits will be deferred—not reduced—due to statutory constraints, a scenario that underscores the need for decisive legislative action.
Congress, therefore, faces a daunting task: how to maintain Social Security as a lifeline for nearly one‑third of retirees while reshaping the program for younger workers confronting a different economic reality. In light of projections from government data and insights from congressional analysis, the need for reform has never been more urgent. Without decisive action, Social Security payments could be deferred, leaving millions at risk of financial hardship in their golden years. Experts agree that preserving current benefits is paramount, while innovative changes are needed to secure long‑term solvency.
Many financial professionals emphasize the serious nature of Social Security’s impending funding problems. They warn that the program’s sustainability hinges on whether policymakers can address its looming funding shortfalls without compromising existing commitments.
“Since approximately 1/3 of all retirees in America rely on Social Security as their primary retirement source of income, a bigger question at hand is whether President Trump’s team is prepared to address the Social Security funding predicament,” says Myles McHale, an instructor at the Cannon Financial Institute. “Several of these issues will play a significant role in the ongoing negotiations about what to leave in and what to leave out in future ERISA policies.”
Some industry veterans stress that for those nearing retirement, preserving full benefit levels is not negotiable. They argue that the Social Security Act legally guarantees these benefits, and any reform must honor those obligations, even if it means postponing fiscal adjustments.
“Ultimately, it seems the approach will either be a bailout or an approach that causes lots of people to feel some pain,” says John Lowell, partner at October Three Consulting. “Under that latter approach, we can expect to see the Wage Base increased significantly, or perhaps uncapped entirely, while at the same time, increasing the Social Security Normal Retirement Age (NRA) for those not currently close to retirement age. I would expect that such a change to NRA might even affect people not yet in the workforce so as to extend the period over which the Social Security system is sustainable.”
This is part of a growing discussion about tailoring Social Security for different generations. While older beneficiaries should continue to receive the full benefits they depend on, reforms for younger workers might include mechanisms that blend traditional benefits with elements of private accounts.
“Congress might preserve Social Security for older generations by gradually increasing payroll taxes or adjusting the wage cap for contributions,” says Brandy Burch, CEO of Benefitbay. “For younger generations, they could consider a tiered system that combines traditional Social Security with private accounts, offering more flexibility and individualized growth potential.”
Additional proposals focus on recalibrating the program’s benefit formulas and exploring new contribution models to secure future solvency. Proponents argue that modernizing these aspects will help the program adapt to longer life spans and changing economic conditions without sacrificing current commitments.
“For older generations, Congress might address the Social Security issue by maintaining current benefits,” says Richard Bavetz, investment advisor at Carington Financial. “ While gradually introducing reforms for younger workers to ensure the program’s solvency, Congress might implement changes such as creating a way for employers to match in Roth dollars, adjusting the retirement age, changing the formula for calculating benefits, basing the distribution age on a minimum number of years worked rather than 59½ or offering optional private investment accounts to complement traditional Social Security. These reforms would preserve the system’s integrity for those relying on it now while modernizing it to reflect longer life expectancies and changing economic conditions. A phased approach would balance fairness with the need for sustainability.”
Some experts caution that any move to transition Social Security into a qualified program with targeted benefits may result in significantly higher administrative costs. They point out that screening beneficiaries and managing a more selective program could strain resources and complicate compliance.
“In coming years, we’re likely to see Social Security shift from a non‑qualified (everyone gets paid) program to a qualified program,” says Eric Steffy, founder and CEO at Federal Solutions Support. “Which means that those most in need are the ones who will qualify for a greater portion of benefits. While running a qualified program can stretch available funds, it’s also more expensive to run. If Social Security moves from near-universal coverage to needing to screen all who apply for the benefits, administrative costs will soar.”
Political considerations further complicate the debate, with some legal analysts warning against approaches that merely postpone the inevitable. They criticize strategies that shift fiscal burdens without addressing underlying issues, suggesting that such tactics only defer tough decisions.
“Such a ‘kick the can down the road again’ strategy would only be the most recent version of ‘Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that guy behind the tree,’” says Jack Towarnicky, Of Counsel for Koehler Fitzgerald, LLC. “Or, if you prefer: ‘The best tax is the one I owe and YOU pay.’ Expect President Trump to succeed in his announced strategy of ‘Not on my watch.’”
Other financial professionals express concern over the bleak long‑term projections for Social Security if major reforms are not undertaken. They argue that without an overhaul—whether through raising taxes, increasing the eligibility age, or cutting benefits—the system could face severe liquidation issues.
“Social Security solvency is, and has been, a huge concern for many,” says Christine Mueller Coley, wealth advisor at SteelPeak Wealth Management. “I once heard someone say, ‘Congress waits until something breaks before they fix it, so Social Security won’t ever really go away.’ However, I don’t feel so confident in that statement anymore. The government has run several scenarios on when the Social Security Trust could become insolvent depending on if they continue to offer Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs), if they continue to tax Social Security Benefits, increase the amount we pay in each year, or if they should cut current benefits – none of these projections are very rosy. It would likely take a large overhaul of the existing system to ensure benefits can continue without major disruptions. So how does Congress fix it? Potentially by raising taxes, raising the age you are eligible to withdraw or just flat out cutting benefits.”
The consensus among experts is that Congress is likely to adopt a dual-track strategy—ensuring current retirees receive full benefits while gradually implementing reforms for younger workers. This approach would involve measures such as increased payroll taxes, an adjusted wage cap, a higher retirement age, and even optional private account features. While the road ahead is fraught with political and administrative challenges, at least someone will eventually fix Social Security—provided Congress doesn’t get distracted by the next headline-grabbing scandal.
Christopher Carosa is an award-winning online news producer and journalist. A dynamic speaker, he’s the author of 401(k) Fiduciary Solutions, Hey! What’s My Number? How to Improve the Odds You Will Retire in Comfort, From Cradle to Retirement: The Child IRA, and several other books on innovative retirement solutions.